Natural Search Blog


W3C Issues Mobile App Guidelines

The World Wide Web Consortium (“W3C”) announced today a mobile web best practices document, providing standards intended to improve the user experience of the web on mobile devices.

This is good, because it will help promote better standards across mobile application development. Until now, developers have been all over the map in terms of how such apps or mobile-enabled sites are created.

So, the big question in my mind — what sort of domain name do they recommend for mobile apps?!? Do they recommend using the .mobi top level domain (“TLD”)?

The answer to this is, they’re suitably neutral about what the TLD should be. They recommend short, short, short — so, they recommend using domains without subdomains such as leaving off the “www”. This is good, because as I’ve pointed out, .Mobi TLD isn’t good since it was launched with heavy rules and I think consumers should only be expected to remember one, central domain name for a site. Even better, the W3C recommendation falls in line with the No-WWW Initiative which recommends setting a site’s primary domain to be the non-WWW version.

So, just based on the W3C recommendation, one might want to avoid using .Mobi extensions because it adds yet another letter to the domain name that cell phone users would have to type in.

Interestingly, one of the W3C editors working on the mobile document is Jo Rabin who is the Director of Industry Initiatives at dotMobi (mTLD Top Level Domain Limited).

2 comments for W3C Issues Mobile App Guidelines »

  1. MyAvatars 0.2

    I am far from convinced by any of this:
    The ‘No www’ thing is entirely contrary to the basic concept of domain names.
    The complaint about .mobi being too long by a single character is typical of the US-centric views of certain parties – the typical domain name here is .co.uk whereas in Russia or China it is a simple .ru etc
    If you can’t even acknowledge these realities then I don’t think we can even start to discuss this.

    Comment by Dave — 7/31/2008 @ 2:35 am


  2. MyAvatars 0.2

    Dave, it’s not that .mobi is “too long” — it’s that it’s that additional text on a cell phone is additional, unnecessary hassle for endusers to type in.

    The reality is that the W3C apparently agrees with this, and built the recommendation with that as a top consideration.

    Comment by Chris Silver Smith — 7/31/2008 @ 8:32 am


Leave a comment

* Do not use spammy names!

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

RSS Feeds
Categories
Archives
2013
Feb      
2011
May      
2010
Jan Feb Mar Apr
Sep      
2009
Jan Feb Apr May
Jun Jul Aug Sep
Oct Nov Dec  
2008
Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Dec  
2007
Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006
Mar Apr May Jun
Jul Aug Sep Oct
Nov Dec    
2005
Jan Feb Mar Dec
2004
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec
Other

web hosts reviews cheap web hosting reviews how to build muscle for women symptoms of depression in women painkiller addiction how to get rid of depression drug addiction