Google has officially confirmed  that they’ll be launching “Chrome” — their newly developed, open-source browser, into the wild tomorrow for the Windows platform.
If you recall, I’d previously posted about rumors of a Google browser here  and here  a year ago, despite Google executives previously indicating that they would not build another browser. A number of other analysts dismissed my observations that a Google browser would be advantageous to the company and complimentary to their various other applications and services – but, I’m now proved right and Google’s efforts to obscure the fact of their browser initiatives appear in retrospect to have been intended to keep the whole thing as top secret as possible until deployment. In 2006, Google CEO Eric Schmidt had stated , “We would only do so…if we thought there was a real user benefit.”
Obviously, Google now believes that there is a real user benefit.
I’m imagining that the main motive Google might’ve had in keeping the Chrome development plans hush-hush could’ve been centered upon concerns that the work could’ve been cited as another reason to consider Google’s massive growth and influence to be somewhat monopolistic. After all, the advent of the Internet Explorer browser, and how it was integrated into the Windows system resulted in a lengthy anti-trust lawsuit between the U.S. Department of Justice and Microsoft.
The Chrome comic book  promoting the browser and educating readers about its features makes a pretty good case for there being compelling reasons for someone to attempt to build a better browser. Browser speed, robustness (reduction in crashes), efficient memory usage in terms of re-use after process completion and good garbage handling, non-intrusive UI, and improved security are all some of the elements that the Google dev team highlighted.
Yet there are downsides, too. Throughout the internet, I sense a collective groan of dismay from website developers as they realize that this could result in increased development costs and headaches as applications will need to be developed and tested on yet another browser platform, once the adoption rate for the new browser spikes up to significant percentages. If Google promotes Chrome through its various applications, particularly through Gmail, the percentage of people using it could become significant fairly rapidly.
It will be interesting to see the other areas where Chrome differs in presentation and functionality from the other top popular browsers. Even if supporting another, different browser platform is a bit of an inconvenience, if the browser functions as well as the comic book describes, it may be well worth the inconvenience.