<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Natural Search Blog &#187; Google-News or user-generated-content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/tag/google-news,user-generated-content/rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com</link>
	<description>Thought leaders in search engine optimization weigh in with the latest SEO news and commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; </copyright>
		<managingEditor>chris@netconcepts.com ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>chris@netconcepts.com()</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Thought leaders in search engine optimization weigh in with the latest SEO news and commentary</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>chris@netconcepts.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Google News comments likely to be panned by major corporations</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2007/08/08/google-news-comments-likely-to-be-panned-by-major-corporations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2007/08/08/google-news-comments-likely-to-be-panned-by-major-corporations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Silver Smith</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[user-generated-content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2007/08/08/google-news-comments-likely-to-be-panned-by-major-corporations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google today introduced a new experimental feature in their News - they&#8217;ve added story participant comments into their listings of stories.

I think it&#8217;s a cool idea, since it invites more community participation in story threads - sort of an evolutionary step on the old threaded format of the old Usenet layout paradigm. If you&#8217;ve ever [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google today introduced a new experimental feature in their News - they&#8217;ve added <a href="http://googlenewsblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/perspectives-about-news-from-people-in.html" target="new">story participant comments</a> into their listings of stories.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1292/1052815849_569b6ee326_o.jpg" alt="Google News" height="98" width="195" /></p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a cool idea, since it invites more community participation in story threads - sort of an evolutionary step on the old threaded format of the old Usenet layout paradigm. If you&#8217;ve ever had a story written about you in news media, and were disappointed to see that the reporter made a mistake or neglected to mention something that you felt was important, this would be a convenient route to mitigating it.</p>
<p>But, from what I&#8217;ve seen commonly happening in the contemporary business community, I&#8217;d bet that most of the major, publicly-traded companies will not engage in commenting on stories about themselves. Read on and I&#8217;ll describe&#8230;<span id="more-291"></span></p>
<p>Most of these companies have a rather old-world mentality about PR, and a considerable amount of bureaucracy to making any public statement at all. Their public affairs offices would wish to obsess over the best response to a story, while their legal departments would want to also vet the communications to excise liabilities such as SEC restrictions on making statements that could be perceived as inaccurate or intended to falsely influence stock valuations. Considering the hurdles to getting anything published, these public affairs departments would likely avoid providing comments altogether, and even those interested in participating might not be able to accomplish publication approval before a story in Google News has already moved out of the limelight.</p>
<p>Danny Sullivan also questions why <a href="http://searchengineland.com/070808-104053.php" title="Google News To Newsmakers: Send Us Your Comments" target="_blank">Google wouldn&#8217;t instead display links to blog commentary</a> - a point which I think is well worth mentioning. While I think this experimental feature is cool, it does tend to break one of the emerging standard protocols of the online space: using blogs to comment on news stories about one&#8217;s self or one&#8217;s company. Why wouldn&#8217;t Google instead enable a story participant&#8217;s official blog to display links to comments on news stories?</p>
<p>Perhaps Google wants to open this up to all the people/companies who do not have blogs. But, it&#8217;s odd that they wouldn&#8217;t first enable links to blog commentary, a la <a href="http://www.techmeme.com" title="Techmeme" target="_blank">Techmeme</a> style. Techmeme does a really cool job of displaying links to news stories, and then provides a little range of links of blogs and other news sites commenting on the story. If Google&#8217;s desire was to open up to everyone who didn&#8217;t already have blogs, I think they still have some problems: the very companies who don&#8217;t already have blogs in one form or another are the ones who would have significant heartburn with using this new comments feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2007/08/08/google-news-comments-likely-to-be-panned-by-major-corporations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Google happenings</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2005/02/07/latest-google-happenings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2005/02/07/latest-google-happenings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Spencer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2005/02/07/latest-google-happenings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Google&#8217;s estimated numbers of search results per query aren&#8217;t to be trusted? Hmm&#8230; kinda looks that way. Certainly Yahoo&#8217;s numbers appear to more believable from this little study.
Google releases an API for Google AdWords - an Application Programming Interface for manipulating your AdWords account programatically without having to do screen scraping. Way cool!
Google unveils new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Google&#8217;s estimated numbers of search results per query aren&#8217;t to be trusted? Hmm&#8230; <a href="http://aixtal.blogspot.com/2005/01/web-googlean-logic-en.html">kinda looks that way</a>. Certainly Yahoo&#8217;s numbers appear to more believable from this little study.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/apis/adwords/">Google releases an API for Google AdWords</a> - an Application Programming Interface for manipulating your AdWords account programatically without having to do screen scraping. Way cool!</li>
<li>Google <a href="http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html">unveils new &#8220;nofollow&#8221; link tag</a>. Yahoo and MSN <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050118-204728">follow suit</a>. I&#8217;m dubious that this is going to do anything to squelch comment spamming, but I thank Google (and Yahoo! and MSN) for giving us website owners better control when we link to sites that we don&#8217;t want to share the &#8220;search engine juice&#8221; with.</li>
<li>Google more than triples its word limit on search queries to <a href="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005-01-22-n48.html">32 words</a>. Good work Google! The 10 word limit was one of my pet peeves. Now I can finally run queries that have a pile of <em>site:</em> operators all separated by ORs. Now please Google will you let me further refine <em>link:</em> queries with additional operators? (Yahoo! and MSN support the use of other operators with <em>link:</em>)</li>
<li>Google launches <a href="http://www.google.com/referral/">Google Referral program</a>, an affiliate program that pays $20 per referred AdWords customer. Sounds kinda cool, but I can&#8217;t imagine I&#8217;ll make nearly the cash I make as an AdSense publisher&#8230;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.tapouillo.com/firefox_extension/sourcecode.txt">Source code</a> released into the public domain for getting the PageRank of a page automatically in PHP. Not that the Toolbar Server can really be trusted anymore to serve up anything resembling the actual PageRank score used by Google&#8217;s ranking algorithm&#8230;</li>
<li>Google <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050204-210153">loses</a> another trademark lawsuit in France relating to selling AdWords ads against trademarked terms. Ouch, that smarts!</li>
<li><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/02/google_q4_2004/">Google earnings for 4th Quarter 2004 top $1 billion</a>. Makes me sorry I don&#8217;t own Google stock&#8230;</li>
<li><a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20050203/0320241_F.shtml">How To Destroy Google With $100 Million?</a> - a flawed idea, but it does make one think&#8230;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2005/02/07/latest-google-happenings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
