<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Natural Search Blog &#187; Google-News</title>
	<link>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com</link>
	<description>Thought leaders in search engine optimization weigh in with the latest SEO news and commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; </copyright>
		<managingEditor>chris@netconcepts.com ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>chris@netconcepts.com()</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Thought leaders in search engine optimization weigh in with the latest SEO news and commentary</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>chris@netconcepts.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Google News comments likely to be panned by major corporations</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2007/08/08/google-news-comments-likely-to-be-panned-by-major-corporations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2007/08/08/google-news-comments-likely-to-be-panned-by-major-corporations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Silver Smith</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[user-generated-content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2007/08/08/google-news-comments-likely-to-be-panned-by-major-corporations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google today introduced a new experimental feature in their News - they&#8217;ve added story participant comments into their listings of stories.

I think it&#8217;s a cool idea, since it invites more community participation in story threads - sort of an evolutionary step on the old threaded format of the old Usenet layout paradigm. If you&#8217;ve ever [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google today introduced a new experimental feature in their News - they&#8217;ve added <a href="http://googlenewsblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/perspectives-about-news-from-people-in.html" target="new">story participant comments</a> into their listings of stories.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1292/1052815849_569b6ee326_o.jpg" alt="Google News" height="98" width="195" /></p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a cool idea, since it invites more community participation in story threads - sort of an evolutionary step on the old threaded format of the old Usenet layout paradigm. If you&#8217;ve ever had a story written about you in news media, and were disappointed to see that the reporter made a mistake or neglected to mention something that you felt was important, this would be a convenient route to mitigating it.</p>
<p>But, from what I&#8217;ve seen commonly happening in the contemporary business community, I&#8217;d bet that most of the major, publicly-traded companies will not engage in commenting on stories about themselves. Read on and I&#8217;ll describe&#8230; <a href="http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2007/08/08/google-news-comments-likely-to-be-panned-by-major-corporations/#more-291" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2007/08/08/google-news-comments-likely-to-be-panned-by-major-corporations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Google happenings</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2005/02/07/latest-google-happenings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2005/02/07/latest-google-happenings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Spencer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2005/02/07/latest-google-happenings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Google&#8217;s estimated numbers of search results per query aren&#8217;t to be trusted? Hmm&#8230; kinda looks that way. Certainly Yahoo&#8217;s numbers appear to more believable from this little study.
Google releases an API for Google AdWords - an Application Programming Interface for manipulating your AdWords account programatically without having to do screen scraping. Way cool!
Google unveils new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Google&#8217;s estimated numbers of search results per query aren&#8217;t to be trusted? Hmm&#8230; <a href="http://aixtal.blogspot.com/2005/01/web-googlean-logic-en.html">kinda looks that way</a>. Certainly Yahoo&#8217;s numbers appear to more believable from this little study.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/apis/adwords/">Google releases an API for Google AdWords</a> - an Application Programming Interface for manipulating your AdWords account programatically without having to do screen scraping. Way cool!</li>
<li>Google <a href="http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html">unveils new &#8220;nofollow&#8221; link tag</a>. Yahoo and MSN <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050118-204728">follow suit</a>. I&#8217;m dubious that this is going to do anything to squelch comment spamming, but I thank Google (and Yahoo! and MSN) for giving us website owners better control when we link to sites that we don&#8217;t want to share the &#8220;search engine juice&#8221; with.</li>
<li>Google more than triples its word limit on search queries to <a href="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005-01-22-n48.html">32 words</a>. Good work Google! The 10 word limit was one of my pet peeves. Now I can finally run queries that have a pile of <em>site:</em> operators all separated by ORs. Now please Google will you let me further refine <em>link:</em> queries with additional operators? (Yahoo! and MSN support the use of other operators with <em>link:</em>)</li>
<li>Google launches <a href="http://www.google.com/referral/">Google Referral program</a>, an affiliate program that pays $20 per referred AdWords customer. Sounds kinda cool, but I can&#8217;t imagine I&#8217;ll make nearly the cash I make as an AdSense publisher&#8230;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.tapouillo.com/firefox_extension/sourcecode.txt">Source code</a> released into the public domain for getting the PageRank of a page automatically in PHP. Not that the Toolbar Server can really be trusted anymore to serve up anything resembling the actual PageRank score used by Google&#8217;s ranking algorithm&#8230;</li>
<li>Google <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050204-210153">loses</a> another trademark lawsuit in France relating to selling AdWords ads against trademarked terms. Ouch, that smarts!</li>
<li><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/02/google_q4_2004/">Google earnings for 4th Quarter 2004 top $1 billion</a>. Makes me sorry I don&#8217;t own Google stock&#8230;</li>
<li><a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20050203/0320241_F.shtml">How To Destroy Google With $100 Million?</a> - a flawed idea, but it does make one think&#8230;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2005/02/07/latest-google-happenings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
